Solar VEEC timing: the January 2025 cutoff in context

Originally published: 11 November 2024. Current context checked: 21 October 2026.

This article discussed a 31 January 2025 cutoff and warned that a change in emissions factors could reduce Victorian Energy Efficiency Certificate (VEEC) value for affected solar projects by up to 26%. That deadline has passed. The figure was a time-specific estimate in the original article, not a measured outcome for every system or a quote for a project starting now. For a current Victorian commercial solar proposal, check the applicable activity, product, installer and evidence requirements with an accredited provider before including any VEEC contribution in a business case.

What the 2024 warning meant

The original article was written for installers with projects approaching a 2025 timing change. Its argument was that commissioning and approval dates could affect certificate quantity and therefore the economics of an installation. It urged early document preparation and coordination. Those were historical project-planning considerations, not an open 2026 approval window. The original 11 November 2024 article preserves that context.

A percentage change in estimated certificate quantity should not be presented as the same percentage change in customer rebate or whole-project return. The outcome also depends on the applicable calculation, certificate sale price, provider fees, contract terms and the customer’s operating savings. Northmore Gordon’s VEEC definition explains the certificate unit and creation steps.

How to assess a solar project now

Victoria now describes a commercial and industrial solar photovoltaic activity under Victorian Energy Upgrades. Its public guidance says businesses and non-residential sites may apply for a discount on a 30–200 kW solar PV system installed through an accredited provider, subject to detailed requirements. The Essential Services Commission identifies it as activity 47 and publishes the activity guide and forms. Those current documents, rather than this 2024 deadline, should determine the route for a new project. A system outside that size band, a different building or a different installation date needs its own pathway assessment; no certificate count is automatic.

Start with the site, system capacity, existing equipment, grid connection and proposed installation date. Ask the accredited provider which activity and guide version apply, whether panels and inverters satisfy product requirements, what records must be collected before and after installation, who will create and own any VEECs, and how the customer discount is calculated. If other renewable-energy certificates may be relevant, check the interaction and any limits before assigning value to each instrument. The Victorian Government’s commercial solar guidance and the Essential Services Commission activity 47 page are the current starting points.

Build a decision case that survives a change in incentive

Keep expected generation and electricity-bill savings separate from an estimated VEEC quantity, an assumed certificate price and the proposed net customer discount. Record the quote date, provider, eligibility conditions and unresolved evidence. Compare the project with and without a conditional incentive so decision-makers can see whether the operating case stands on its own. Do not carry the 2024 “up to 26%” warning into a 2026 spreadsheet as an established price change or a universal haircut.

For a current technical and commercial assessment, see smart commercial solar, government schemes and certificate services. Contact Northmore Gordon with the site, system size, delivery stage and available energy data to discuss the scope of an assessment; an accredited provider must confirm any VEU claim pathway.

Why is the January 2025 deadline critical for Victorian solar projects?

The 31 January 2025 date was the cutoff discussed in Northmore Gordon’s November 2024 article. It is now past. The article warned that a planned emissions-factor change could reduce estimated VEEC value for affected projects by up to 26%; that was a time-specific estimate, not a universal measured outcome or a current deadline. A new solar project should use the activity rules and accredited-provider advice applicable to its own installation date.

What is the connection between emission factors and VEEC values?

A scheme emissions factor can affect the calculated greenhouse-gas reduction and therefore the estimated number of VEECs for an eligible activity. The 2024 article forecast an effect of up to 26% for its then-relevant solar projects. That percentage should not be treated as a guaranteed change in tradable certificate price, the customer discount or whole-project payback. Current projects need the applicable activity calculation, version, date and commercial terms.

What approval steps must be completed before the ESC deadline?

The 31 January 2025 deadline and any associated approval sequence are historical. For a project starting now, an accredited provider should identify the current VEU activity, its implementation or activity-date rule, product and installation conditions, evidence requirements and submission process. Victoria’s current commercial and industrial solar guidance describes a 30–200 kW activity, and the Essential Services Commission publishes activity 47 guidance and forms. Do not use the 2024 cutoff as a current approval instruction.

How do installation delays affect a solar project's financial viability?

A delay can defer generation and electricity-bill savings and can affect costs or any conditional incentive, but the impact must be calculated for the actual project. The 2024 article’s 'up to 26%' warning concerned its forecast VEEC context around the 2025 cutoff; it is not a universal 2026 rebate reduction. Compare generation, capital cost, certificate quantity, assumed price, provider fees and customer discount separately, then test the investment case with and without the incentive.

Why might the approval process take longer than installers expect?

Approval and certificate-creation timing depends on the activity and the completeness of the evidence, product and installation records. The original article anticipated bottlenecks near the January 2025 cutoff; it did not establish processing times for a current application. Engage an accredited provider early, assign responsibility for connection, product, commissioning and ownership records, and use the current Essential Services Commission activity guide to plan the evidence sequence.

What role does measurement and verification play in securing VEEC approval?

Measurement and verification can support a project’s engineering case by recording generation and operating assumptions, but it does not by itself secure VEEC approval. The current commercial and industrial solar activity has its own product, installer, site, capacity, evidence and calculation requirements. Ask the accredited provider what data the applicable guide requires. Keep verified energy performance separate from certificate eligibility and the customer’s contracted discount.

How should clients factor the VEEC deadline into their investment decision?

Treat the 2025 cutoff as historical context only. A current investment case should state the applicable activity and guide version, estimated VEEC quantity, assumed certificate price, proposed net customer discount, timing and outstanding conditions. Present expected generation and bill savings separately and compare outcomes with and without the conditional incentive. Do not use the 2024 article’s 'up to 26%' estimate as a current price haircut or forecast for every system.

What steps can Northmore Gordon take to help installers meet the deadline?

The 31 January 2025 deadline cannot be met now. For a current project, Northmore Gordon can help with technical and commercial assessment, energy and generation assumptions, evidence planning and coordination with an accredited provider. The provider must confirm the current Victorian Energy Upgrades activity, eligibility, required records and certificate claim process. No consultant can promise a maximum rebate or accelerated regulator approval without a project-specific assessment and agreed scope.

What is the difference between VEEC value and actual project payback?

VEECs, when applicable, are one possible contribution to a solar project’s economics. Payback also depends on system cost, generation, electricity tariffs, self-consumption, maintenance and financing. The 2024 article’s 'up to 26%' forecast was about its then-relevant certificate calculation, not the percentage change in total project payback. Show engineering savings, estimated certificate quantity, assumed price and net customer proceeds as separate lines, and test a no-incentive scenario.

Images on This Page